Plattenburg v. Gilliam
Plaintiff: Derreck Plattenburg
Defendant: Kenneth Dwight Gilliam
Case Number: 4:2017cv01651
Filed: June 1, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Walker
Presiding Judge: Melinda Harmon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Plaintiff's claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(rhawkins)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Plattenburg v. Gilliam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Derreck Plattenburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth Dwight Gilliam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?