Crosby v. Department Of Homeland Security Citizenship & Immigration
Plaintiff: Tenille Crosby
Defendant: Department Of Homeland Security Citizenship & Immigration
Case Number: 4:2017cv03166
Filed: October 19, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Sim Lake
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 20 Memorandum and Recommendations, granting 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crosby v. Department Of Homeland Security Citizenship & Immigration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department Of Homeland Security Citizenship & Immigration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tenille Crosby
Represented By: Chukwudi Ifeanyi Egbuonu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?