Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. Bico Drilling Tools, Inc.
Plaintiff: Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Defendant: Bico Drilling Tools, Inc.
Counter_claimant: Bico Drilling Tools, Inc.
Counter_defendant: Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Case Number: 4:2017cv03211
Filed: October 23, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Harris
Presiding Judge: Gray H Miller
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 77 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING 53 Sealed motion for summary judgment.(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
September 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - The court ADOPTS Schlumberger's claim construction for the term an external tube comprising an outer surface and an inner surface, the inner surface comprising at least to radially inwardly projecting lobes, in that no construction is needed. The term shall have its plain and ordinary meaning. The parties agree as to the construction of all other terms. (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
May 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 30 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (BICO's Third Counterclaim - Inequitable Conduct), DENYING 24 Corrected MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Correcting Dkt. 23).(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
January 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Agreed Protective ORDER. (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. Bico Drilling Tools, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Represented By: Brian Christopher Banner
Represented By: Truman Haymaker Fenton
Represented By: Bruce W Slayden, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bico Drilling Tools, Inc.
Represented By: Brett Ashley McKean
Represented By: Charles Bruce Walker, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Bico Drilling Tools, Inc.
Represented By: Charles Bruce Walker, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Represented By: Brian Christopher Banner
Represented By: Truman Haymaker Fenton
Represented By: Bruce W Slayden, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?