Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. Bico Drilling Tools, Inc.
Schlumberger Technology Corporation |
Bico Drilling Tools, Inc. |
Bico Drilling Tools, Inc. |
Schlumberger Technology Corporation |
4:2017cv03211 |
October 23, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Houston Office |
Harris |
Gray H Miller |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 77 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING 53 Sealed motion for summary judgment.(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4) |
Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - The court ADOPTS Schlumberger's claim construction for the term an external tube comprising an outer surface and an inner surface, the inner surface comprising at least to radially inwardly projecting lobes, in that no construction is needed. The term shall have its plain and ordinary meaning. The parties agree as to the construction of all other terms. (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4) |
Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 30 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (BICO's Third Counterclaim - Inequitable Conduct), DENYING 24 Corrected MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Correcting Dkt. 23).(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4) |
Filing 20 Agreed Protective ORDER. (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.