Flores v. La Estancia Apartments, et al.
Helder Flores |
Eureka Multifamily Group, 2015 Houston Gulfton LLC, LA Estancia Apartments, City Of Houston, Thomas L Harris, Anton M Mawhood and City of Houston, Texas |
4:2017cv03817 |
December 19, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Houston Office |
Harris |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 166 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered: The court finds no basis to reconsider its March 2019 Memorandum and Order granting summary judgment to the City of Houston. The court denies Flores's motion for reconsideration. (Docket Entry No. 150). (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4) |
Filing 129 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: The officers' motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 102), is granted for all claims against Mawhood and for all claims against Harris except for Flores's excessive force claim. The City's motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 100), is granted. The defendants' motion to dismiss, (Docket Entry No. 79), is denied as moot(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4) |
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered DENYING Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Diligently Serve. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.