Harvest Natural Resources, Inc. et al v. Mendoza Garcia et al
| Harvest Natural Resources, Inc. and HNR Energia B.V. |
| Juan Jose Mendoza Garcia, Petro Consultores S.C., Petro Consultores International Trading Company, Inc., Azure 904 LLC, Rafael Dario Ramirez Carreno, Eulogio Antonio Del Pino Diaz, Jose Angel Gonzalez Acosta, Petroconsultores (Barbados) Ltd., Petroconsultores, Inc., Selle LLC and Azure 406 LLC |
| 4:2018cv00483 |
| February 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION - Granting in part and Denying in part 142 Response to Order to Show Cause/Request to Redact and Seal. Ramirezs motion to redact certain information in Docket Entry Nos. 109, 119, 122, and 126 is granted. These documents wil l be unsealed in part, after Ramirez has redacted the specified information. Ramirezs motion to redact Docket Entry Nos. 109-4, 109-5, 109-9, 109-10, 109-28, 109-29, and 109-30 is granted. These documents will be unsealed in part, after Ramirez has r edacted the requested information.Ramirezs motion to keep Docket Entry Nos. 81, 109-1, 109-17, 109-73, and 119-3 under seal is denied. Ramirez must provide a redacted version of Docket Entry No. 81, as described above. Ramirezs motion to keep Docket Entry Nos. 109-18, 109-34, 109-36, 109-37, 109-72, 109-74, 109-76, 119-4, and 122-4 under seal is otherwise granted. Ramirez must file the redacted documents by October 14, 2020. ( Notice of Compliance due by 10/14/2020 - redacted documents due). (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
|
Filing
137
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Granting in part and Denying in part 72 MOTION to Set Aside Final Default Judgment as to 66 Default Judgment and MOTION to Dismiss in Accordance with Rules 12(B)(2) and 12(B)(5). Thedefault judgment i s vacated, but the case is not dismissed....*** Scheduling and Status Conference set for 6/25/2020 at 08:30 AM in by video before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. The parties must submit a proposed scheduling order by June 18, 2020....*** Case reopened on 6/9/20. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER entered: The motion for a corrected judgment, (Docket Entry No. 67), is granted. Default judgment is separately entered against Ramirez for $1,416,118,657.98. Harvest and HNR Energia are entitled to reasonable attorneys fees, expenses, and costs. They must move under Rule 54(d) within 14 days of enforcing the judgment. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: Harvest's motion for jurisdictional discovery, (Docket Entry No. 33), is granted. The parties have until June 28, 2018, to conduct jurisdictional discovery limited to the defendants jurisdictional ties and contacts . Harvest may depose Garcia, and he must appear, but he may choose to appear in either Miami, Florida, or Houston, Texas. The parties must have completed jurisdictional discovery by July 6, 2018. Harvest must respond to the defendants motion to dismiss by August 3, 2018; the defendants must reply by August 10, 2018; and oral argument will be held on August 24, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 11-B.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
