Balke et al
| Thomas Balke, TEBJES Inc. and Ultrawave Technology for Emulsion Control |
| Don B Carmichael, KK & PK Family LP, Barry D Winston and Gary Emmott |
| 4:2018cv00731 |
| March 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER entered DENYING 55 First EMERGENCY MOTION MOTION for Extension of Time to File Appellants Brief.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER entered: Abating the briefing deadlines will prejudice the appellees and further delay the adjudication of the first appeal. There is no basis to find prejudice to the appellants by requiring them to proceed. To the co ntrary, any prejudice from the continued delay will be visited on the appellees. The appellants' motion to abate briefing deadlines is denied.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4) Modified on 1/3/2020 (leddins, 4).
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER entered: The court denies the appellants' motion for a stay under Rule 8007, without prejudice to consideration of an appeal from any decision of the bankruptcy court on the motion for a stay. The court orders the appellants to appear before the bankruptcy court to move for a stay of the sale. The appellants' motion for a stay is denied. (Docket Entry No. 28). (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER entered: A district court has broad discretion in separating issues and claims for trial "[f]or convenience, to avoid prejudice, or to expedite and economize." Fed R. Civ. P. 42. Because the first appeal cannot proceed until the merits of the third appeal are resolved, it is more efficient to separately administer the two appeals. The appellees' motion to bifurcate, (Docket Entry No. 24), is granted. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER entered DENYING as MOOT 2 MOTION : The appellants motion to determine appellate jurisdiction is denied as moot, without prejudice subject to either partys reurging based on supplemental briefing. (Docket Entry No. 2). The appellants must file supplemental briefing on the Rule 8002(b) issue by Friday, May 18, 2018. The appellees must respond by Friday, May 25, 2018.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
