Headen et al v. Abundant Life Therapeutic Services Texas, LLC et al
| 4:2018cv00773 |
| September 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER OF DISMISSAL entered: For the reasons stated in the court's Memorandum and Opinion of this date, Headen's second amended complaint is dismissed. Counts I, II, III, and IV are dismissed, with prejudice and without leave to amend. Count V is dismissed, without prejudice, for refiling in state court. Case terminated on 4/30/19. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered: GRANTING 14 MOTION to Dismiss 12 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. Plaintiff may amend by 1/25/19. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER entered MOOTING 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b).(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Headen et al v. Abundant Life Therapeutic Services Texas, LLC et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
