Stalons et al v. Houston Chronical et al
| Stalons Betty, Richard Stalons and Betty Stalons |
| Doe 1, Doe 5, Doe 4, Doe 3, Doe 2, Houston Chronical and Houston Chronicle |
| 4:2018cv02453 |
| July 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Kenneth M Hoyt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Summons Issued as to Houston Chronicle. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(jdav, 4) |
| Filing 3 Other EXHIBITS re: #1 Complaint by Betty Stalons, Richard Stalons (rguerrero, 4) Modified on 8/31/2018 (jdav, 4). |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Counsel who filed or removed the action is responsible for placing the conference call and insuring that all parties are on the line. The call shall be placed to (713)250-5613. Telephone Conference set for 12/3/2018 at 09:00 AM by telephone before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt(Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(ckrus, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Richard Stalons, Betty Stalons. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(hler, 4) Modified on 8/31/2018 (jdav, 4). |
| Filing fee: $400 re: #1 Complaint, receipt number 081690, filed. (pyebernetsky, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
