Cossey v. Advertising Higher Inc., et al.
| Michael Cossey |
| Ron Francois and Advertising Higher, Inc. |
| 4:2018cv02734 |
| August 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Montgomery |
| Lynn N Hughes |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Final DISMISSAL. Having been advised that Cossey no longer wishes to pursue his claims against Advertising Higher and Ron Francois, this case is dismissed without prejudice #4 . If refiled in this district, the case will be assigned to Judge Lynn N. Hughes. Case terminated on 8/21/2018. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Dismissal as to All Defendants by Michael Cossey, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Scalise, Charles) |
Filing 3
ORDER FOR CONFERENCE. Initial Conference set for 11/5/2018 at 03:00 PM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N Hughes (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified.(hcarradi, 4)
|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Michael Cossey, filed.(Scalise, Charles) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-20624071) filed by Michael Cossey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Scalise, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
