Odom et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: William Mitchell Odom and Bettye Odom
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Case Number: 4:2018cv02942
Filed: August 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Lee H Rosenthal
Nature of Suit: Tort Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2018 Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, filed.(Gallagher, Kathleen)
September 26, 2018 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Johnson & Johnson, filed.(Gallagher, Kathleen)
September 26, 2018 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Ethicon, Inc., filed.(Gallagher, Kathleen)
September 14, 2018 Filing 5 First CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons Issued/Not Issued, #2 Summons - Request for Issuance by Bettye Odom, William Mitchell Odom, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation)(Dunken, Bert)
August 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols re Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
August 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 11/30/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Judge's Procedures) Parties notified.(ckrus, 4)
August 27, 2018 Summons Issued as to Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(hler, 4)
August 24, 2018 Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation 2nd Summons)(Dunken, Bert)
August 24, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-20739402) filed by William Mitchell Odom, Bettye Odom.(Dunken, Bert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Odom et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Mitchell Odom
Represented By: Bert Tarrant Dunken, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bettye Odom
Represented By: Bert Tarrant Dunken, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc.
Represented By: Kathleen A Gallagher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson
Represented By: Kathleen A Gallagher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?