Dotson v. SandBox Transportation, LLC
Craig Dotson |
SANDBOX TRANSPORTATION, LLC |
4:2018cv03228 |
September 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Sandbox Transportation, LLC filed by Craig Dotson.(Alexander, William) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings - Judgment by Sandbox Transportation, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/28/2018. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Burnside, Andrew) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Sandbox Transportation, LLC, filed.(Burnside, Andrew) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Sandbox Transportation, LLC, filed.(Burnside, Andrew) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. It is ORDERED that Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint is October 23, 2018. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (wbostic, 4) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleadings by Sandbox Transportation, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/30/2018. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Burnside, Andrew) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Craig Dotson, filed.(Alexander, William) |
Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Sandbox Transportation, LLC served on 9/18/2018, answer due 10/9/2018, filed.(Alexander, William) |
Filing 4 ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for FLSA.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4) |
Filing 3 ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 12/14/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(RuthGuerreroadi, 4) |
Summons Issued as to SANDBOX TRANSPORTATION, LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail.(rguerrero, 4) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to SANDBOX TRANSPORTATION, LLC, filed.(Alexander, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SANDBOX TRANSPORTATION, LLC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-20853140) filed by Craig Dotson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent of Craig Dotson, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Alexander, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dotson v. SandBox Transportation, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SANDBOX TRANSPORTATION, LLC | |
Represented By: | Andrew Phelps Burnside |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Craig Dotson | |
Represented By: | William Clifton Alexander |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.