Gonzalez v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Roberto Scott Gonzalez and Bobby Scott Gonzalez |
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID |
4:2018cv03302 |
September 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Alfred H Bennett |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RESPONSE to #6 Order of Dismissal, filed by Bobby Scott Gonzalez. (SamanthaWarda, 4) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on 10/4/18 (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4) |
Filing 5 Certified Mail Receipt Returned - #4 receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (jtabares, 1) |
***Delivery Confirmation; delivery date(s) In transit re: 3 Document(s) Sent, filed. (dhansen, 4) |
Filing 4 ORDER entered. It is ordered, that this matter be transferred, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a), to the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division.(Signed by Judge Fernando Rodriguez, Jr) Parties notified.(scastillo, 1) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (rnieto, 1) |
Case transferred in from Brownsville Division on 09/14/2018 ; Case Number 1:18-cv-147. Case assigned to Judge Alfred H Bennett filed by Roberto Scott Gonzalez, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID.(scastillo, 1) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Roberto Scott Gonzalez. (rnieto, 1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.