Gonzalez v. Port Packaging, LLC
Miguel Gonzalez and Felix Rodriguez-Salinas |
Port Packaging, LLC |
4:2018cv03327 |
September 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Consent to Joint Wage Claim by Felix Rodriguez-Salinas, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Form Felix Rodriguez-Salinas)(Assaad, Gabriel) |
Filing 4 ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for FLSA.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4) |
Filing 3 ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 12/14/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(hcarradi, 4) |
Summons Issued as to Port Packaging, LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(rguerrero, 4) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Port Packaging, LLC, filed.(Assaad, Gabriel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Port Packaging, LLC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-20901919) filed by Miguel Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Assaad, Gabriel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.