RooR International BV et al v. 290 Smoke Shop et al
Sream, Inc. and RooR International BV |
John Doe and 290 Smoke Shop |
4:2018cv03708 |
October 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lynn N Hughes |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Order Resetting Conference. Initial Conference reset for 1/8/2019 at 03:00 PM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N Hughes. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by RooR International BV, Sream, Inc., filed.(Jacoby, Andrew) |
Filing 4 Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, AO-120, Notified. (RuthGuerreroadi, 4) |
Filing 3 ORDER FOR CONFERENCE. Initial Conference set for 1/14/2019 at 03:00 PM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N Hughes (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified.(RuthGuerreroadi, 4) |
Summons Issued as to 290 Smoke Shop. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(hler, 4) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to 290 Smoke Shop, filed.(Jacoby, Andrew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 290 Smoke Shop, John Doe (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-21040137) filed by RooR International BV, Sream, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E)(Jacoby, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.