Muehlemann v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
Michael Edward Muehlemann |
R Razo, Director Bryan Collier and Texas Department Of Criminal Justice |
4:2018cv03904 |
October 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Alfred H Bennett |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The plaintiff is not assessed an initial partial filing fee because he lacks the requisite funds. The plaintiff shall pay $350.00, the balance of this filing fee, in periodic installments as required by USC 1915(b). The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall collect this amount from the plaintiff's trust account and forward it to the Court..(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(gkelner, 4) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (dnoriega, 1) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Michael Edward Muehlemann, filed. (dnoriega, 1) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Michael Edward Muehlemann, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/6/2018. (dnoriega, 1) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Michael Edward Muehlemann.(dnoriega, 1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/18/2018: #1 Unredacted attachment) (dnoriega, 1). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.