Sutro v. El Recodo Enterprises, LLC et al
| Sean Sutro |
| Carlos Ivan Zamora and El Recodo Enterprises, LLC |
| 4:2018cv03915 |
| October 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Kenneth M Hoyt |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Summons Issued as to El Recodo Enterprises, LLC, Carlos Ivan Zamora. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(rguerrero, 4) |
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Counsel who filed or removed the action is responsible for placing the conference call and insuring that all parties are on the line. The call shall be placed to (713)250-5613. Telephone Conference set for 4/9/2019 at 09:00 AM by telephone before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(JenniferOlsonadi, 4)
|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-21112255) filed by Sean Sutro. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bireley, John) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Carlos Ivan Zamora, filed.(Bireley, John) |
| Filing 1 Request for Issuance of Summons as to El Recodo Enterprises, LLC, filed.(Bireley, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
