Duhaly v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company
| Ali Duhaly |
| The Cincinnati Insurance Company |
| 4:2018cv04158 |
| November 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Minute entry for proceedings before the Hon. Lee H. Rosenthal. Initial conference held on December 17, 2018. The parties have until January 11, 2019 to replead. The parties must file any pleading challenges by January 18, 2019, and the initial discovery discussed in the hearing must be completed by February 1, 2019. A status conference is set for February 15, 2019 at 9:00 a.m.. Appearances:Steven Owsley for Pltf. and Sean Matula for Deft.(Court Reporter: N. Forrest), filed.(leddins, 4) |
| Filing 8 Amended CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by The Cincinnati Insurance Company, filed.(Loveless, David) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses by The Cincinnati Insurance Company, filed. (Loveless, David) |
| Filing 6 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by The Cincinnati Insurance Company, filed.(Loveless, David) |
Filing 5
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols re Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 12/17/2018 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Judge's Procedures) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, by The Cincinnati Insurance Company, filed.(Loveless, David) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by The Cincinnati Insurance Company, filed.(Loveless, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 133rd District Court of Harris County, Texas, case number 2018-73377 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-21202186) filed by The Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Tab 1 - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Tab 2 - Executed Process, #3 Exhibit Tab 3 - Pleadings, #4 Exhibit Tab 4 - Order Signed, #5 Exhibit Tab 5 - Docket Sheet, #6 Exhibit Tab 6 - Index of Matter, #7 Exhibit Tab 7 - List of Counsel)(Loveless, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Duhaly v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ali Duhaly | |
| Represented By: | Shawn E. Ozlat |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Cincinnati Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | David Kyle Loveless |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
