Sanders et al v. The Boeing Company
Matthew Sodrok and Lee Marvin Sanders |
The Boeing Company |
4:2018cv04248 |
November 8, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
David Hittner |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on November 28, 2018 (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Dismissal as to The Boeing Company by Lee Marvin Sanders, Matthew Sodrok, filed. (Davis, Joshua) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Lee Marvin Sanders, Matthew Sodrok, filed.(Davis, Joshua) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/10/2019 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(RuthGuerreroadi, 4) |
Summons Issued as to The Boeing Company. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(hler, 4) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to The Boeing Company, filed.(Davis, Joshua) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lee Marvin Sanders, Matthew Sodrok (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-21246382) filed by Lee Marvin Sanders, Matthew Sodrok.(Davis, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.