Abdulijabbar v. Attorney General of the United States et al
| Teimoor Abdulijabbar |
| Kristjen Nielsen, Randy Tate, Jerry D Turner, Thomas Homan, Attorney General of the United States, William Kowis, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and The GEO Group |
| 4:2018cv04364 |
| November 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Titiana Obando to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting #3 Motion for Hana H. Shatila to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Hana H. Shatila, from USDOJ, Civil Division, Wahshington, D.C. to Appear Pro Hac Vice for all Defendants, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/2/2019. (mmarquez, 5) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Tatiana Obando to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Teimoor Abdulijabbar, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/7/2018. (thanniable, 4) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Teimoor Abdulijabbar.(thanniable, 4) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/16/2018: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (thanniable, 4). |
| Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number HOU084382, filed. (jdav, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
