Nguyen v. Lacy
Lam Nguyen |
Robert Lacy, Jr., Jeff Sessions, Bret A Bradford and Kirstjen Nielsen |
4:2018cv04675 |
December 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Alfred H Bennett |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 12/28/2018 re: 4 Document(s) Sent, - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (SarahShelby, 4) |
Filing 6 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 12/26/18 re: 4 Document(s) Sent, - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (nortiz, 5) |
Filing 5 Certified Mail Receipt Returned as to Ryan Patrick, executed on 12/26/2018 [per USPS website] re: 4 Document(s) Sent, - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (SarahShelby, 4) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO ANSWER. Respondents must file answer or other response within 90 days of receipt of service. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(gclair, 4) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (rguerrero, 4) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Lam Nguyen.(rguerrero, 4) |
Filing fee: $5 re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, receipt number HOU084951, filed. (hlerma, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.