Davis v. Miller et al
| Terry Matthew Davis |
| Tanya Lawson, P. Miller, S. Anderson and Issac Kwarteng |
| 4:2019cv00142 |
| January 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Terry Matthew Davis re: #1 Complaint, filed.(nortiz, 5) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Terry Davis, filed.(jmarks, 2) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting #4 MOTION to Dismiss, denying as moot #2 Motion to Proceed IFP. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Case terminated on 1/24/2019 (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Voluntary Dismissal by Terry Matthew Davis, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/6/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(scastillo, 1) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (nortiz, 5) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Terry Matthew Davis, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/4/2019. (nortiz, 5) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/14/2019: #1 Envelope) (nortiz, 5). |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against S. Anderson, Issac Kwarteng, Tanya Lawson, P. Miller (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Terry Matthew Davis.(nortiz, 5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
