Holloman et al v. G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc.
Shanida M. Young and Kevin R. Holloman |
G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc. |
4:2019cv00297 |
January 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Vanessa D Gilmore |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc. identifying G4S plc as Corporate Parent, filed.(Eisenlohr-Moul, Kelly) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Kelly Eisenlohr-Moul to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(jdav, 4) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Kelly Eisenlohr-Moul to Appear Pro Hac Vice by G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 3/15/2019. (Seaton, Samantha) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc. served on 1/30/2019, answer due 4/1/2019, filed.(Rosenberg, Gregg) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/7/2019 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 9A before Judge Vanessa D Gilmore. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(hcarradi, 4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-21741647) filed by Kevin R. Holloman, Shanida M. Young. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A)(Rosenberg, Gregg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.