State of Texas v. Stepp
Plaintiff: Richard Stepp and State of Texas
Defendant: 361st District Court
Case Number: 4:2019cv00381
Filed: February 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Andrew S Hanen
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2019 Filing 14 VOLUNTARY STATEMENT by Richard Stepp, filed.(mxperez, 5)
March 19, 2019 ***Delivery Confirmation for delivery date(s) 3/18/2019 re: 12 Document(s) Sent, filed. (dhansen, 4)
March 18, 2019 Filing 13 Voluntary STATEMENT by Richard Stepp, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation)(dbenavides, 1)
March 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER OF REMAND. This case REMANDED to the 361st Judicial District Court of Brazos County, Texas, Stepp's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 2] and for appointment of counsel [Doc. No.4] are DENIED as MOOT. Case terminated on 3/14/2019(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
March 11, 2019 Filing 10 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION of Richard B. Stepp, filed.(fcarbia, 2)
February 13, 2019 Filing 9 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Richard Stepp, filed.(mmarquez, 5)
February 13, 2019 Filing 8 Certified Mail Receipt Returned re: 7 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (dnoriega, 1)
February 11, 2019 ***Delivery Confirmation for delivery date(s) In transit re: 7 Document(s) Sent, filed. (dhansen, 4)
February 4, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (dbenavides, 1)
February 1, 2019 Filing 5 PROPOSED ORDER re: #4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, filed.(dbenavides, 1)
February 1, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Richard Stepp, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/22/2019. (dbenavides, 1)
February 1, 2019 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Richard Stepp, filed. (dbenavides, 1)
February 1, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Richard Stepp, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/25/2019. (dbenavides, 1)
February 1, 2019 Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against 361st District Court (Filing fee $ 400) filed by 361st District Court. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(dbenavides, 1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/4/2019: #2 Exhibit A) (dbenavides, 1). (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/4/2019: #3 Envelope) (dbenavides, 1).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: State of Texas v. Stepp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 361st District Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Stepp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: State of Texas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?