Pineda et al v. Perlick et al
| Esther Cruz, Henry Argueta and Danilo Pineda |
| Patricia Porto Perlick, Velleriano Italy Operating Partnership, LP and Velleriano Houston Acquisition Corp. |
| 4:2019cv00424 |
| February 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Henry Argueta, Esther Cruz, Danilo Pineda, filed.(Flores, Reies) |
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/17/2019 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(RuthGuerreroadi, 4)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summon, #2 Summon, #3 Summon, #4 Summon, #5 Summon, #6 Summon)(hlerma, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Envelope Summons, #2 Envelope Summons, #3 Envelope Summons, #4 Envelope Summons, #5 Envelope Summons, #6 Envelope Summons)(Ahmad, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-21819275) filed by Danilo Pineda, Esther Cruz, Henry Argueta. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ahmad, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
