Davis v. Miller et al
Terry Matthew Davis |
C.O. III J. Padilla, Counselor A. Canc and Head Warden G. Miller |
4:2019cv00504 |
February 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Vanessa D Gilmore |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 2-21-19 re: 4 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons, filed. (rnieto, 1) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on 2/20/19 Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM ON DISMISSAL denying #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. Copy mailed to Inmate Trust Fund, TDCJ Office of the General Counsel. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (rnieto, 1) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Terry Matthew Davis, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/5/2019. (rnieto, 1) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against A. Canc, G. Miller, and J. Padilla (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Terry Matthew Davis. (rnieto, 1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.