Howard v. Police Officer (Male) et al
Petitioner: George Octave Howard
Respondent: Police Officer (Female), Independent Police Oversight Board Officer and Police Officer (Male)
Case Number: 4:2019cv00552
Filed: February 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Vanessa D Gilmore
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2019 Filing 11 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to George Octave Howard re: #10 Order of Dismissal, filed. (dmorales, 5)
March 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case dismissed without prejudice on 3/15/2019 (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
March 15, 2019 Filing 9 MEMORANDUM ON DISMISSAL Denying #3 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
March 7, 2019 Filing 8 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to George Octave Howard re: #5 Notice of Deficient Pleading (FORM), filed. (lcorbett, 7)
March 6, 2019 Filing 7 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to George Octave Howard re: #4 Notice to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, filed. (SarahShelby, 4)
February 26, 2019 Filing 6 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by George Octave Howard, filed.(mmapps, 4)
February 21, 2019 Filing 5 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to George Octave Howard. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 3/25/2019, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (bgoolsby, 4)
February 19, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (nortiz, 5)
February 19, 2019 Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by George Octave Howard, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/12/2019. (nortiz, 5)
February 15, 2019 Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of George Ocatve Howard re: #1 Complaint, filed.(nortiz, 5)
February 15, 2019 Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Independent Police Oversight Board Officer, Police Officer (Female), Police Officer (Male) (Filing fee $ 400) filed by George Octave Howard.(nortiz, 5) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/19/2019: #1 Envelope) (nortiz, 5).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Howard v. Police Officer (Male) et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Police Officer (Female)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Independent Police Oversight Board Officer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Police Officer (Male)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: George Octave Howard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?