Cloud v. Davis
| Willie Cloud |
| Director of TDCJ Lorie W Davis and Lorie Davis |
| 4:2019cv00602 |
| February 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER denying as moot #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
|
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Willie Cloud, filed. (SamanthaWarda, 4) |
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Willie Cloud, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/2/2019. (SamanthaWarda, 4) |
| Initial Filing fee: $5 re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, receipt number HOU086570, filed. (thanniable, 4) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO ANSWER. The respondent shall file an answer to the petition, in compliance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, no later than 4/26/2019. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(olindor, 4)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (gkelner, 4) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Willie Cloud. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Envelope)(gkelner, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
