GM Gold & Diamonds, LP v. Bay Jewelers 2, et al.
| GM Gold & Diamonds, LP |
| NASIR UDDIN QURESHI and BAY JEWELERS 2, INC. dbs Bay Jewelers |
| 4:2019cv00790 |
| March 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service-Corp)(Mackay, Robert) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by GM Gold & Diamonds, LP, filed.(Mackay, Robert) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/10/2019 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 3A Houston before Judge Keith P Ellison. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(hcarradi, 4)
|
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(jguajardo, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 SUMMONS-Corp)(Mackay, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-21995912) filed by GM Gold & Diamonds, LP. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mackay, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
