Rizvi v. RJ Engineering Systems, Inc. et al
| Syed Asad Aijaz Rizvi |
| Rakesh Kumar Jain and RJ Engineering Systems, Inc. |
| 4:2019cv01812 |
| May 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Rakesh Kumar Jain, RJ Engineering Systems, Inc., filed.(Choudhary, Ajay) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summon)(hlerma, 4) |
| Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation)(Ahmed, Salar) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Syed Asad Aijaz Rizvi, filed.(Ahmed, Salar) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 9/20/2019 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(jdavadi, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rakesh Kumar Jain, RJ Engineering Systems, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22453617) filed by Syed Asad Aijaz Rizvi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - A, #2 Exhibit - B, #3 Exhibit - C, #4 Exhibit - D, #5 Exhibit - E)(Ahmed, Salar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
