Hines v. Harris County, Texas et al
Andre Hines |
Sherman Eagleton and Precinct #3 Harris County, Texas |
4:2019cv01816 |
May 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
David Hittner |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 9/4/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4) |
Filing 3 Ex Parte MOTION for Continuance of Initial appearance by Andre Hines, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/5/2019. (Lipps, John) |
Summons Issued as to Sherman Eagleton, Precinct #3 Harris County, Texas. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(gkelner, 4) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/24/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ckrus, 4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22459432) filed by Andre Hines. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lipps, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.