Johnson v. Davis
| Fredrick Wayne Johnson |
| Lori Davis and Lorie Davis |
| 4:2019cv01975 |
| May 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 FINAL JUDGMENT. This action is dismissed with prejudice. Case terminated on 6/27/2019. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4) |
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER dismissing with prejudice #1 Petition for Writ Habeas Corpus granting #2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, denying #4 MOTION for Summary Judgment. A Certificate of Appealability is denied. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (dwilkerson, 3) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Summary Judgment with Brief in Support by Fredrick Wayne Johnson, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/20/2019. (dwilkerson, 3) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Fredrick Wayne Johnson, filed. (dwilkerson, 3) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Fredrick Wayne Johnson, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/20/2019. (dwilkerson, 3) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Lori Davis.(dwilkerson, 3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
