Platter v. G Force Cement Works, L.L.C. et al
Kenneth Platter |
Glen R. Bonds and G Force Cement Works, L.L.C. |
4:2019cv02012 |
June 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Gray H Miller |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER Granting #6 Motion for substituted service.(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4) |
Filing 6 MOTION Order Permitting Substitute Service of Defendants by Kenneth Platter, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/15/2019. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Exhibit "A" Affidavit of Process Server, #2 Proposed Order)(Scalise, Charles) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(hlerma, 4) |
Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed.(Scalise, Charles) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Scheduling Order Deadline date 8/30/2019 (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(SarahShelbyadi, 4) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Kenneth Platter, filed.(Scalise, Charles) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22553375) filed by Kenneth Platter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Scalise, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.