Moore v. Herrer et al
| David T Moore |
| Robert Herrera, Erica Hopkins and Paul Wilder |
| 4:2019cv02052 |
| June 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Letter to the Court from David T. Moore, filed. (rnieto, 1) |
| Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT. Case terminated on 6/25/19(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION granting #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. TDCJ-CID must continue to forward payments until filing fee is paid in full. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. Mailed to TDCJ-Office of the General Counsel and the Inmate Trust Fund.(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (bmendoza, 5) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by David T Moore, filed. (bmendoza, 5) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by David T Moore, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/27/2019. (bmendoza, 5) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Paul Wilder, Robert Herrera, Erica Hopkins (Filing fee $ 400) filed by David T. Moore.(bmendoza, 5) . |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
