Carbajal-Alvarado v. Contreras et al
| Edwin Mauricio Carbaj Alvarado and Edwin Mauricio Carbajal-Alvaredo |
| Patrick D Contreras, Jennifer Higgins, Kevin K. McAleenan and Robert Lacy, Jr. |
| 4:2019cv02225 |
| June 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Certified Mail Receipt Returned for Patrick Contreras - receipt attached, Re: #2 access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (aveliz, 5) |
| Filing 4 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 7/2/19 - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (nortiz, 5) |
| Filing 3 Certified Mail Receipt Returned - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (nortiz, 5) |
Filing 2
ORDER FOR AN ANSWER. Copies mailed by regular mail to Acting United States Attorney General Matthew George Whitaker and Field Office Director Patrick Contreras(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Edwin Mauricio Carbaj Alvarado.(ckrus, 4) |
| Filing fee: $5 re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, receipt number 089374, filed. (ckrus, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
