Verdine v. Davis
| Charles Jerome Verdine |
| Lori Davis and Lorie Davis |
| 4:2019cv02231 |
| June 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| *** Pltf's #4 Motion to Amend and #5 Non-Consent Form forwarded via regular mail to ED/TX - Beaumont Div to be filed in case no. 1:19-cv-280. COPY of #3 Transfer Order filed on 6/25/19 mailed to Pltf, filed. (sanderson, 4) ****Case TRANSFERRED to ED/TX - Beaumont Div on 6/25/19 and filed under 1:19-cv-280 |
| Filing 5 Non-CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Charles Jerome Verdine re: "I DO NOT CONSENT", filed.(sanderson, 4) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Amend #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Charles Jerome Verdine, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/9/2019. (sanderson, 4) |
Filing 3
ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(kpicota, 4)
|
| Interdistrict transfer to Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 6/25/2019, filed. (kpicota, 4) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (SarahShelby, 4) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Charles Jerome Verdine.(scastillo, 1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
