Shell Trading (US) Company v. Best Petroleum Corporation
| Shell Trading (US) Company |
| Best Petroleum Corporation |
| 4:2019cv02267 |
| June 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER entered GRANTING #10 Unopposed MOTION to Reset Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference. Joint Discovery/Case Management Plan due by 10/15/2019 and Initial Conference reset for 10/22/2019 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION to Reset Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Shell Trading (US) Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Reset the Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference)(Schmid, Megan) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Best Petroleum Corporation served on 7/11/2019, answer due 9/9/2019, filed.(Schmid, Megan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Vacation by Shell Trading (US) Company, filed. (Gernert, Caitlin) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Vacation by Shell Trading (US) Company, filed. (Schmid, Megan) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols re Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Best Petroleum Corporation. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(SarahShelby, 4) |
| Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Best Petroleum Corporation, filed.(Gernert, Caitlin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Caitlin E. Gernert on behalf of Shell Trading (US) Company, filed. (Gernert, Caitlin) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 9/27/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Continuation) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Best Petroleum Corporation (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22669575) filed by Shell Trading (US) Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schmid, Megan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shell Trading (US) Company v. Best Petroleum Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Best Petroleum Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shell Trading (US) Company | |
| Represented By: | Megan Healy Schmid |
| Represented By: | Caitlin E Gernert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
