Lamb v. Berry et al
| Keith Alexander Lamb, Jr |
| Rand Henderson, Deputy Michael Berry, Gordon Dudley, Ken Paxton, Unknown Magistrate and Brett Ligon |
| 4:2019cv02492 |
| July 10, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Kenneth M Hoyt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Rand Henderson served on 7/20/2019, answer due 8/12/2019, filed.(thanniable, 4) |
| Filing 13 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Michael Berry served on 7/19/2019, answer due 8/9/2019, filed.(thanniable, 4) |
| Filing 12 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Gordon Dudley served on 7/19/2019, answer due 8/9/2019, filed.(thanniable, 4) |
| Filing 11 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Ken Paxton served on 7/20/2019, answer due 8/12/2019, filed.(thanniable, 4) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Michael Berry, Gordon Dudley, Rand Henderson, Brett Ligon, Ken Paxton, Unknown Magistrate filed by Keith Alexander Lamb, Jr. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Keith Alexander Lamb, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(thanniable, 4) |
| Filing 9 REPLY in Support of #5 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint , filed by Ken Paxton. (Akatugba, Cynthia) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to #5 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint , filed by Keith Alexander Lamb, Jr. (BrendaLacy, 4) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Cynthia O. Akatugba to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Cynthia O. Akatugba to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Ken Paxton, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/29/2019. (Dower, Benjamin) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint by Ken Paxton, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dower, Benjamin) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE in Opposition to #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Keith Alexander Lamb, Jr. (sguevara, 4) |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Michael Berry, Gordon Dudley, Rand Henderson, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/23/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State criminal complaint, #2 Exhibit penal code excerpts, #3 Proposed Order)(Plake, Daniel) |
| Summons Issued as to Ken Paxton. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(gkelner, 4) |
| Summons Issued as to Rand Henderson. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(gkelner, 4) |
| Summons Issued as to Michael Berry, Rand Henderson, Ken Paxton. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(jdav, 4) |
| Summons Issued as to Michael Berry, Gordon Dudley, Rand Henderson, Ken Paxton. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(thanniable, 4) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Counsel who filed or removed the action is responsible for placing the conference call and insuring that all parties are on the line. The call shall be placed to (713)250-5613. Telephone Conference set for 12/9/2019 at 08:45 AM by telephone before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt(Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(thanniable, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Berry, Gordon Dudlely, Rand Henderson, Ken Paxton filed by Keith Alexander Lamb, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(thanniable, 4) |
| Initial Filing fee: $400 re: #1 Complaint, receipt number HOU089823, filed. (thanniable, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.