Conway v. Perfection Collection LLC et al
Paul Conway |
John Does 1-25 and Perfection Collection LLC |
4:2019cv02549 |
July 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Vanessa D Gilmore |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Yaakov Saks to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(LoriPurifoy, 4) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Perfection Collection LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(SarahShelby, 4) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Yaakov Saks to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Paul Conway, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/10/2019. (Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Perfection Collection LLC, filed.(Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 12/6/2019 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 9A before Judge Vanessa D Gilmore(Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(ckrus, 4) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Paul Conway, filed.(Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22787474) filed by Paul Conway. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit a)(Jaffer, Shawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.