Novakovic v. Barr et al
Ognjen Novakovic |
William Barr, Kevin McAleenan, Joe Smith and Patrick Contreras |
4:2019cv02557 |
July 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Peter Bray |
Lynn N Hughes |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 8/6/19 re: #4 Order to Answer to US Attorney General - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (sanderson, 4) |
Filing 5 Certified Mail Receipt Returned - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (LoriPurifoy, 4) |
Filing 6 Certified Mail Receipt Returned - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (LoriPurifoy, 4) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO ANSWER. Answer due within 60 days of this order. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray) Parties notified.(jmarchand, 4) |
Filing 3 Specific Referral to Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (mmapps, 4) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Ognjen Novakovic. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mmapps, 4) |
Filing fee: $5.00 re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, receipt number HOU089879, filed. (mmapps, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.