Agbonifo v. Smith
Michael Ojegha Agbonifo and Michael Ojegba Agbonifo |
Michael D Smith |
4:2019cv02710 |
July 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Keith P Ellison |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL #3 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Case terminated on 7/29/2019. Any and all pending motions are denied as moot. A certificate of appealability is denied. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (JenniferOlson, 4) |
Filing 4 INCORRECT PARTY INFORMATION - DISREGARD. SEE DOCKET #5. NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (JenniferOlson, 4) Modified on 7/24/2019 (JenniferOlson, 4). |
Filing 3 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Michael Ojegha Agbonifo, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/9/2019. (mmarquez, 5) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM In Support re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Michael Ojegha Agbonifo, filed.(mmarquez, 5) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 218 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Michael Ojegha Agbonifo. (mmarquez, 5) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/23/2019: #1 Attachments) (mmarquez, 5). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.