Young et al v. Arkema, Inc
| Jasmine Young and Clarence Edwards |
| Arkema, Inc |
| 4:2019cv02812 |
| July 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses by Clarence Edwards, Jasmine Young, filed. (Jackson, Tracie) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Stay Proceedings Until the Conclusion of Parallel Criminal Proceedings by Arkema, Inc, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Proposed Order)(Brem, Michael) |
Filing 4
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols re Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Arkema, Inc, filed.(Brem, Michael) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 10/22/2019 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(LoriPurifoyadi, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22891182) filed by Jasmine Young, Clarence Edwards.(Jackson, Tracie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
