Taggart v. Gonzales
| Dion Lee Taggart |
| Ed Gonzales and Aramark Employee |
| 4:2019cv02814 |
| July 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Vanessa D Gilmore |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Dion Lee Taggart, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/24/2019. (ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
| Filing 6 Proposed CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Dion Lee Taggart, filed.(sanderson, 4) |
Filing 5
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
|
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Dion Lee Taggart. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 9/5/2019, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (bgoolsby, 4) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (amireles, 2) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Dion Lee Taggart, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/20/2019. (amireles, 2) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Aramark Employee, Ed Gonzales (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Dion Lee Taggart. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(amireles, 2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
