Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc. et al v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al
Nabors Industries, Inc. and Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc. |
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and Deepwell Energy Services, LLC |
4:2019cv02854 |
August 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
David Hittner |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, filed.(Hanna, Catherine) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc., Nabors Industries, Inc., filed.(Schick, Daniel) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Deepwell Energy Services, LLC, filed.(Piazza, Frank) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/17/2019 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(hcarradi, 4) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 133rd Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas, case number 2019-42744 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22902033) filed by Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Hanna, Catherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.