Oladipo v. McAleenan et al
Shakky Oladipo |
Attorney General William Barr, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Citizenship and Immigration Services, Wallace L. Carroll, David L. Neal, Merilee Fong, Executive Office For Immigration Review, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, James McHenry, Kevin K. McAleenan, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and William Barr |
4:2019cv02875 |
August 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Alfred H Bennett |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to All Defendants, filed.(Sim, Troy) |
Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(hlerma, 4) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to William Barr, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Wallace L. Carroll, Merilee Fong, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, James McHenry, David L. Neal, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(Sim, Troy) |
Filing 1 PETITION/COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22908952.) filed by Shakky Oladipo.(Sim, Troy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.