Ahmadi v. Davis et al
Reza Ahmadi |
David G Gutierrez, Lorie Davis and Charley Valdez |
Ahmadi Reza |
4:2019cv03260 |
August 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Nancy F Atlas |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT. Case terminated on 10/22/2019(Signed by Judge Nancy F Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, 4) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTED #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The civil action filed by Reza Ahmadi is DISMISSED with prejudicefor failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.The Clerks Office will provide a copy of this order to the plaintiff. (Signed by Judge Nancy F Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, 4) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE CASES (Signed by Judge Nancy F Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, 4) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (bmendoza, 5) |
Filing 2 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Ahmadi Reza, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/17/2019. (bmendoza, 5) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/29/2019: #1 Unredacted attachment) (bmendoza, 5). |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Lorie Davis, David G Gutierrez, Charley Valdez (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Ahmadi Reza.(bmendoza, 5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.