Stine v. Bank of America, N.A.
Joe Stine |
Bank of America, N.A. |
4:2019cv03265 |
August 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Charles Eskridge |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Reassignment to Judge Charles Eskridge, pursuant to Special Order No. 2019-4. Deadlines in scheduling orders remain in effect, and all court settings are vacated. Judge Gray H Miller no longer assigned to the case. Parties notified, filed. (ndiaz, 4) |
Filing 10 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Bank of America, N.A., filed.(Davis, Kathryn) |
Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Bank of America, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 10/30/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1st Deed of Trust, #2 Exhibit B-Assignment, #3 Exhibit C-2014 Loan Modification Agreement, #4 Exhibit D-2nd Deed of Trust, #5 Exhibit E-Notice of Default, #6 Exhibit F-Notice of Acceleration and Sale, #7 Proposed Order)(Davis, Kathryn) |
Filing 8 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bank of America, N.A. filed by Joe Stine.(DeLaRue, Erick) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE IN A REMOVED ACTION by Bank of America, N.A., filed.(Davis, Kathryn) |
Filing 6 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Scheduling Order Deadline date 10/11/2019(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) |
Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Bank of America, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 9/26/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1st Deed of Trust, #2 Exhibit B-Assignment, #3 Exhibit C-2014 Loan Modification Agreement, #4 Exhibit D-2nd Deed of Trust, #5 Exhibit E-Notice of Default, #6 Exhibit F-Notice of Acceleration, #7 Proposed Order)(Davis, Kathryn) |
Filing 4 STATEMENT re: #3 Order in Removed Cases - FORM - Miller by Bank of America, N.A., filed.(Davis, Kathryn) |
Filing 3 Order in Removed Cases. Statement due within ten days. (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(SarahShelbyadi, 4) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Bank of America, N.A., filed.(Davis, Kathryn) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 80th District Court, Harris County, case number 2019-53351 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23079623) filed by Bank of America, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit B-Appraisal District Card, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, Kathryn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stine v. Bank of America, N.A. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A. | |
Represented By: | Kathryn Buza Davis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Joe Stine | |
Represented By: | Erick Joseph DeLaRue |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.