Chavez v. Branch Banking and Trust Company
Alice Marie Chavez |
Branch Banking and Trust Company |
4:2019cv03373 |
September 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Kenneth M Hoyt |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Petition by Branch Banking and Trust Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/21/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Danaher, Philip) |
Filing 8 First AMENDED PETITION against Branch Banking and Trust Company filed by Alice Marie Chavez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Vilt, Robert) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time; Answer due for Branch Banking and Trust Company 10/14/2019.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(chorace) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), by Branch Banking and Trust Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(Danaher, Philip) |
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time (Second) to Respond to Plaintiff's Original Petition by Branch Banking and Trust Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/22/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Danaher, Philip) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time; Answer due for Branch Banking and Trust Company 9/27/2019.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(LoriPurifoy, 4) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Counsel who filed or removed the action is responsible for placing the conference call and insuring that all parties are on the line. The call shall be placed to (713)250-5613. Telephone Conference set for 12/12/2019 at 08:45 AM before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(chorace) |
Filing 2 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Original Petition by Branch Banking and Trust Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Danaher, Philip) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court 269th Judicial District, Harris County, Texas, case number 2019-61303 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23127617) filed by Branch Banking and Trust Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cronenwett, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chavez v. Branch Banking and Trust Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Alice Marie Chavez | |
Represented By: | Robert Clayton Vilt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Branch Banking and Trust Company | |
Represented By: | Mark Douglas Cronenwett |
Represented By: | Philip W Danaher |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.