Bowers v. BackChina, LLC et al
| Eric Bowers |
| BackChina, LLC. and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive |
| 4:2019cv03544 |
| September 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Gray H Miller |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by BackChina, LLC., filed.(Ramey, William) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to BackChina, LLC. served on 9/24/2019, answer due 10/15/2019, filed.(Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 5 Register of Copyrights Notified. AO-121, filed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (RubenCastroadi, 4) |
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Scheduling Order Deadline date 12/27/2019 (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(RubenCastroadi, 4)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to BACKCHINA, LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(rcastro, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to BACKCHINA, LLC, filed.(Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ERIC BOWERS (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23212129) filed by ERIC BOWERS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A - B, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Higbee, Mathew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
