Trevino v. Micro-Tech Endoscopy USA, Inc.
Victor Trevino |
Micro-Tech Endoscopy USA, Inc. |
4:2019cv03578 |
September 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting #9 MOTION to Dismiss ,. Case terminated on 11/11/19. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(LoriPurifoy, 4) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Victor Trevino, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Dismiss)(Strother, Justin) |
Filing 8 REPLY in Support of #2 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), (3), and (6), filed by Micro-Tech Endoscopy USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 4)(Kim, John) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE to #2 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), (3), and (6) filed by Victor Trevino. (Strother, Justin) |
Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1), (3) & (6) re: #2 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), (3), and (6), filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kim, John) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE IN A REMOVED ACTION by Micro-Tech Endoscopy USA, Inc., filed.(Kim, John) |
Filing 4 ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols re Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4) |
Filing 3 ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 11/26/2019 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Supplement) Parties notified.(leddins, 4) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), (3), and (6) by Micro-Tech Endoscopy USA, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 10/21/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)(Kim, John) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 61st Judicial District Court, case number 2019-58030 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23225795) filed by Micro-Tech Endoscopy USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Index #1, #2 Index #2, #3 Index #3, #4 Index #4)(Kim, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Trevino v. Micro-Tech Endoscopy USA, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Victor Trevino | |
Represented By: | Justin Strother |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Micro-Tech Endoscopy USA, Inc. | |
Represented By: | John Hooshik Kim |
Represented By: | David Allen McDougald |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.