Loyaly et al v. Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company
Sophia Loyaly and Bedford Loyaly |
Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company |
4:2019cv03861 |
October 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Keith P Ellison |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Bedford Loyaly, Sophia Loyaly, filed.(McClelland, Shane) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 State Court Petition/Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company, filed.(Schexnyder, LaDonna) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/31/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 3A Houston before Judge Keith P Ellison. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(olindoradi, 4) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 400th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas, case number 19-DCV-265805 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23314410) filed by Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Index of Items Being Filed, #4 Certified State Court Record, #5 List of Parties and Counsel of Record, #6 Certificate of Interested Parties, #7 Notice of Removal to State Court)(Schexnyder, LaDonna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.